SOCIAL SECURITY OF NUCLEAR ENTERPRISES: SOCIO-HISTORICAL ANALYSIS

The article examines social security from the social position. Based on the theory of institutional matrices S.G. Kirdina highlighted the internal (stable) and superficial (institutional) structure of this institution. The inner structure includes such elements as globality, systematic manifestation, penetration into all levels of society, formation of stable social relations, fear, preventive nature of the use of measures to eliminate the negative consequences of social risks. The surface structure is made up of types of security. An analysis of social security at macro-, meso- and microlevels was carried out in the appendix to the Russian enterprise. At the macrolevel, the industry is the subject of social security. Industry leadership strives to protect its member enterprises from the negative consequences of social risks. To do this, it forms the principles, strategy, tactics, social policy and its directions that are uniform for all enterprises that are part of it. In total, the article highlights eight areas of social policy that a modern enterprise can use to minimize the negative consequences of risks arising in its social environment. A division (mesolevel) and a specific enterprise (microlevel) are objects of social security. The principle of the minimum universe, proposed by V.G. Nemirovsky, made it possible to identify three levels of social security of an enterprise (material-energy, functional-organizational, informational). Socio-historical analysis helped to trace the social security of specific industrial enterprises of the nuclear industry, such as MCC, SKhK and PA Mayak, in different historical periods of their existence (the period of formation, prosperity, crisis and modernization). The analysis made it possible to assert that each historical period of the enterprise's development has a direct impact on the social security of nuclear enterprises. We were also able to identify the levels of social security for each of them.