Vol. 53 No. 4 (2025): Published December 30, 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/26584956/2025/4/2003
Hero of our yard: transformative leadership in the living environment
This article explores the concept of the "hero of our yard" – an active resident who is a key figure in the development of a neighborhood community and the transformation of the residential environment. In the context of limited effectiveness of management companies and weak institutional participation, it is these figures who initiate self-organization, restoring lost forms of neighborly interaction and creating new practices of engagement in the life of a residential complex. The "hero of our yard" is a charismatic local leader who not only solves everyday issues but also builds trust, unites neighbors, and imbues the community with a sense of belonging. This work is interdisciplinary: sociology explores the mechanisms of self-organization, psychology explores personality traits and motivational attitudes, and philosophy explores the symbolic significance of the hero figure. A systems approach allows us to consider the active resident as a structurally significant element initiating interactions in the residential environment. Aim. To understand who the "hero of our yard" is, what motivates him, and what areas of activity and functions he performs. Methods. A review of scientific literature on self-organization, leadership, neighborhood relations, and local communities. Results. The authors developed a conceptual model of the "hero of our yard" as a leader of a neighborhood community. This material will be useful for researchers, practitioners, and managers working on developing sustainable living environments. The presented model encourages a rethinking of the role of proactive residents as agents of change. The authors propose viewing the "hero of our yard" as a tool for creating a supportive, sustainable, and inclusive living environment.
Keywords:
living environment, self-organization , leader, neighborhood community, active resident
References:
Список литературы
1. Бурцева В.С. Дружественность как системная характеристика жилой среды: значимость и запросы молодой семьи с детьми раннего возраста // Векторы благополучия: экономика и социум. – 2025. – Т. 53. – № 1. – С. 200–214. DOI: 10.18799/26584956/2025/1/1958. EDN: DEVMWQ.
2. Лосев А.Ф. Диалектика мифа. – M.: Азбука, 2023. – 165 c.
3. Мелетинский Е. М. Происхождение героического эпоса. – M.: Восточная литература, 2004. – 462 c.
4. Иванов А.Г. Мифологема героя в структуре социального мифа // Вестник Томского государственного университета. – 2019. – № 441. – С. 80−88. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/441/11. EDN: CEUOOL.
5. Теплова Е.Ф. Детство в городе 1950−1980-х гг.: двор как пространство социализации // Этнодиалоги. – 2020. – № 1 (59). – C. 85−94. DOI: 10.37492/ETNO.2020.59.1.004.
6. Тиняева Н.В. Двор как феномен городской среды // Архитектура и современные информационные технологии. – 2012. – № 2 (19). – С. 1–16. EDN: PCFZPH.
7. Литвинцев Д.Б. Двор многоквартирного дома как социокультурный концепт и его влияние на соседские практики // Городские исследования и практики. – 2023. – Т. 8. – № 1. – C. 89–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/usp81202389-96.
8. Емельяненкова А.В. Психологические аспекты исследования восприятия двора жилого дома // Симбирский научный вестник. – 2015. – № 2 (20). – С. 29–33. EDN: VUCQGJ.
9. Чернявская Ю. Советское как детское: опыт двора // Логос. – 2017. – Т. 27. – № 5 (120). – С. 219–240. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2017-5-219-239. EDN: ZBNIIJ.
10. Чернега А.А. Сила местных сообществ: практики, механизмы и модели участия жителей в социокультурном развитии территории (на примере малых населенных пунктов Вологодской области) // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. – T. 23. – № 3. – C. 51–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.3.3.
11. Хрипков К.А. Регулирование процессов самоорганизации локальных сообществ: автореф. … канд. социол. наук. – Белгород, 2021. – 19 c.
12. Чернышева Л. «Убирай или убирайся». (Само)управление, сообщество и гражданство в новых жилых комплексах в российских городах // Социологическое обозрение. – 2024. – T. 23. – № 2. – C. 39−66. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2024-2-39-66.
13. Suhartini N., Jones P. Better understanding self-organizing cities: A typology of order and rules in informal settlements // Journal of regional and city planning. – 2020. – Vol. 31. – № 3. – P. 237–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2020.31.3.2. EDN: AFSRUA.
14. Huisman C., Czischke D. Between self-organization and formal participation: increasing tenants’ influence through self-management? – a Dutch case-study // Housing, Theory and Society. – 2022. – Vol. 40. – № 2. – P. 219–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2022.2150681.
15. Шомина Е.С., Кузнецов С.А. Сообщество – соседство – добрососедство: теория и практика реализации концепции // Градостроительное право. – 2020. – № 2. – С. 44–48.
16. Грачёв В.В., Хациева И.А. Руководство и лидерство как механизмы групповой интеграции в социальной психологии // Материалы XIII Международной студенческой научной конференции «Студенческий научный форум». URL: https://scienceforum.ru/2021/article/2018026156?ysclid=mdyen0cde1558632508 (дата обращения 05.05.2025).
17. Казаринова Д.Б. Теория коллективных действий: политические импликации // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 71−78.
18. Olson M. The logic of collective action. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965. – 179 p.
19. Агадуллина Е.Р. Коллективные действия: предикторы и модели // Социальная психология и общество. – 2013. – Т. 4. – № 3. – С. 42–51.
20. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict // The social psychology of intergroup relations / Eds. W.G. Austin, S. Worchel. – Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979. – P. 33–47.
21. Turner J.C., Reynolds K.J. The story of social identity // Rediscovering Social Identity: Core Sources / Eds. T. Postmes, N. Branscombeю – New York: Psychology Press, 2010. – P. 13–32.
22. Spillane J.P. Distributed leadership. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006. – 142 p.
23. Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания. – М.: Медиум, 1995. – 323 с.
24. Маженина Е.А. Социокультурная специфика самоорганизации населения на территории: дис. … канд. социол. наук. – Кемерово, 2000. – 153 c.
25. Рогач О.В. Социальный капитал: новые возможности развития местных сообществ // Социодинамика. – 2019. – № 9 – С. 25–39. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2019.9.30550.
26. Терехова Т.А. Социальный капитал, его взаимосвязь с инновационным потенциалом и самореализацией личности // Психология в экономике и управлении. – 2014. – № 2. – C. 38−47. EDN: TEDCYH.
27. Bennis W. On becoming a leader. – Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1989. – 224 p.
28. Zhang Z., Yu J., Tian J. Community participation, social capital cultivation and sustainable community renewal: a case study from Xi’an’s Southern Suburbs, China // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. – 2023. – Vol. 15. – P. 11007–11040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01536-x.
29. Heylighen F. The Science of self-organization and adaptivity // Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity: vol. 3 / ed. by L.D. Kiel. – EOLSS Publishers Co Ltd, 2002. URL: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/EOLSS-Self-Organiz.pdf (дата обращения 12.04.2025).
30. Байков Н.М., Березутский Ю.В., Юревич Е.Ю. Социальная активность жителей городского округа: политическая и гражданская самоорганизация // Власть и управление на Востоке России. – 2021. – № 1 (94). – C. 128−138. DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2021-94-1-128-138.
31. Бондаренко К.И. Подходы к изучению лидерства и лидерских качеств // Материалы X Международной студенческой научной конференции «Студенческий научный форум». URL: https://scienceforum.ru/2018/article/2018003298?ysclid=me0tq8b1sv134873334 (дата обращения 07.04.2025).
32. Шомина Е.С. Соседские центры как элемент инфраструктуры соседского сообщества // Экономические и социально-гуманитарные исследования. – 2015. – № 4 (8). – C. 95−104.
33. Тыканова Е.В., Тенишева К.А. В плену «эффекта соседства»: социальный капитал и активизм в новых анклавных жилищных комплексах // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. – 2020. – T. 23. – № 2. – C. 7–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.2.1.
34. De Roo G. Self-organization and spatial planning: foundations, challenges, constraints and consequences // Spatial Planning in a Complex Unpredictable World of Change: Towards a proactive co-evolutionary type of planning within the Eurodelta / Eds. G. de Roo, L. Boelens. – Coöperatie InPlanning UA, 2016. – P. 54–97. URL: https://research.rug.nl/ en/publications/self-organization-and-spatial-planning-foundations-challenges-con (дата обращения 12.04.2025).
References
1. Burtseva V.S. Friendliness as a systemic characteristic of the residential environment: significance and needs of young families with young children. Journal of Wellbeing Technologies, 2025, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 200–214. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18799/26584956/2025/1/1958. EDN: DEVMWQ.
2. Losev A.F. Dialectics of myth. Moscow, Azbuka Publ., 2023. 165 p. (In Russ.)
3. Meletinsky E.M. The origin of the heroic epic. Moscow, Eastern Literature Publ., 2004. 462 p. (In Russ.)
4. Ivanov A.G. The hero mythologem in the structure of a social myth. Tomsk State University Journal, 2019, no. 441, pp. 80–88. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/15617793/441/11. EDN: CEUOOL.
5. Teplova E.F. Childhood in the city of the 1950–1980s: the yard as a space of socialization. Ethnodialogues, 2020, no. 1 (59), pp. 85–94. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.37492/ETNO.2020.59.1.004.
6. Tinyaeva N.V. Courtyard as a phenomenon of the city environment. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2012, no. 2 (19), pp. 1–16. (In Russ.) EDN: PCFZPH.
7. Litvintsev D.V. Courtyard of an apartment building as a socio-cultural phenomenon and its impact on neighborhood practices. Urban Studies and Practices, 2023, vol. 8, no 1, pp. 89–96. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/ usp81202389-96.
8. Emelyanenkova A.V. Psychological aspects of the survey on the yard of a house perception. Simbirsk Scientific Bulletin, 2015, no. 2 (20), pp. 29–33. (In Russ.) EDN: VUCQGJ.
9. Chernyavskaya Yu. The soviet as the childlike: the case of the courtyard. Logos, 2017, vol. 27, no. 5 (120), pp. 219–240. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2017-5-219-239. EDN: ZBNIIJ.
10. Chernega A.A. The power of local communities»: practices, mechanisms and models of resident’s participation in sociocultural development of territories (on the materials of small towns and villages in the Vologda Region). The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2020, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 51–77. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.3.3.
11. Khripkov K.A. Regulation of self-organization processes of local communities. Cand. Diss. Abstract. Belgorod, 2021. 19 p. (In Russ.)
12. Chernysheva L. «Clean Off or Get Out». (Self)Governance, Community and Citizenship in New Large Housing Estates in Russian Cities. Russian sociological review, 2024, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 39–66. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2024-2-39-66.
13. Suhartini N., Jones P. Better understanding self-organizing cities: a typology of order and rules in informal settlements. Journal of regional and city planning, 2020, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 237–263. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2020.31.3.2. EDN: AFSRUA.
14. Huisman C., Czischke D. Between self-organization and formal participation: increasing tenants’ influence through self-management? – a Dutch case-study. Housing, Theory and Society, 2022, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 219–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2022.2150681.
15. Shomina E.S., Kuznetsov S.A. Community – neighborhood – good neighborliness: theory and practice of implementing the concept. Urban planning law, 2020, no. 2, pp. 44–48. (In Russ.)
16. Grachev V.V., Khatsieva I.A. Management and leadership as mechanisms of group integration in social psychology. Proc. of the XIII International Student Scientific Conference. Student Scientific Forum. (In Russ.) Available at: https://scienceforum.ru/2021/article/2018026156?ysclid=mdyen0cde1558632508 (accessed 5 May 2025).
17. Kazarinova D.B. Collective action theory: the political dimension. Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science, 2011, no. 3, pp. 71–78. (In Russ.)
18. Olson M. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1965. 179 p.
19. Agadullina E.R. Collective action: predictors and models. Social Psychology and Society, 2013, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 42–51. (In Russ.)
20. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Eds. W.G. Austin, S. Worchel. Monterey, CA, Brooks/Cole, 1979. pp. 33–47.
21. Turner J.C., Reynolds K.J. The story of social identity. Rediscovering Social Identity: Core Sources. Eds. T. Postmes, N. Branscombe. New York, Psychology Press, 2010. pp. 13–32.
22. Spillane J.P. Distributed leadership. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2006. 142 p.
23. Berger P., Luckmann T. Social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Moscow, Medium Publ., 1995. 323 p. (In Russ.)
24. Mazhenina E.A. Sociocultural specificity of self-organization of the population on the territory. Cand. Diss. Kemerovo, 2000. 153 p. (In Russ.)
25. Rogach O.V. Social capital: new opportunities for the development of local communities. Sociodynamics, 2019, no. 9, pp. 25–39. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2019.9.30550.
26. Terekhova T.A. Social capital, its interrelation with innovative potential and self-realization of the personality. Psychology in Economics and Management, 2014, no. 2, pp. 38–47. EDN: TEDCYH.
27. Bennis W. On becoming a leader. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1989. 224 p.
28. Zhang Z., Yu J., Tian J. Community participation, social capital cultivation and sustainable community renewal: a case study from Xi’an’s Southern Suburbs, China. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2023, vol. 15, pp. 11007–11040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01536-x.
29. Heylighen F. The Science of self-organization and adaptivity. Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity: vol. 3. Ed. by L.D. Kiel. EOLSS Publishers Co Ltd, 2002. Available at: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/EOLSS-Self-Organiz.pdf (accessed 12 April 2025).
30. Baykov N.M., Berezutskiy Yu.V., Yurevich E.Yu. Social activity of urban district residents: political and civil self-organization. Power and Administration in the East of Russia, 2021, no. 1 (94), pр. 128–138. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22394/1818-4049-2021-94-1-128-138.
31. Bondarenko K.I. Approaches to the study of leadership and leadership qualities. Proc. of the X International Student Scientific Conference. Student Scientific Forum. Available at: https://scienceforum.ru/2018/article/ 2018003298?ysclid=me0tq8b1sv134873334 (accessed 7 April 2025).
32. Shomina E.S. Neighborhood centers as an element of the infrastructure of the neighborhood community. Economic and social-humanitarian studies, 2015, no. 4 (8), pp. 95–104. (In Russ.)
33. Tykanova E., Tenisheva K. Trapped by the “neighborhood effect”: social capital and activism in the new enclave condominiums. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2020, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 7–35 (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.2.1.
34. De Roo G. Self-organization and spatial planning: foundations, challenges, constraints and consequences. Spatial Planning in a Complex Unpredictable World of Change: Towards a proactive co-evolutionary type of planning within the Eurodelta. Eds. G. de Roo, L. Boelens. Coöperatie InPlanning UA, 2016. pp. 54–97. Available at: https://research.rug.nl/ en/publications/self-organization-and-spatial-planning-foundations-challenges-con (accessed 12 April 2025).
