Vol. 54 No. 1 (2026): Published March 30, 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/26584956/2026/1/2023
Documentary support for the creation of IT-products as part of the implementation of IT-projects
The article presents the results of the analysis of national standards that establish requirements for the sequence of work on creating IT-products, for the composition, types, name, completeness, designation, content and design of project documentation, as well as for the sequence of acceptance of the created IT-product. A critical understanding of the requirements allowed us to establish that national standards do not take into account the legal and technological features of creating IT-products within the framework of IT-projects. In particular, transfer of ownership and exclusive rights to an IT-product, creation of program code as part of a service assignment, etc. It was also found that legal and project documentation should be considered as a single set of documents, since hiring employees and creating an IT-product are impossible without entering into contracts. The results obtained made it possible to improve the structure of project documentation provided for in SS R 59853. Among the main advantages of the improvement, it is necessary to note the ability to determine the degree of mastering by IT-subjects of the requirements that declare the documentary support of the creating IT-products. For example, if an IT-organization does not assess the impact of management decisions, resources spent, or commercial impact, this may indicate that it does not have internal standards for managing IT-projects. It is important to note that the lack of standardization negatively affects the creation of IT-products, because again and again IT-actors will need to find the best management solution for a problem that may have been solved earlier in other IT-projects.
For citation: Nikolaenko V.S. Documentary support for the creation of IT-products as part of the implementation of IT-projects. Journal of Wellbeing Technologies, 2026, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 37–48. https://doi.org/10.18799/26584956/2026/1/2023
Keywords:
project management, IT-product, IT project, IT-subject, risk
References:
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
1. Болтанова Е.С., Романова О.А., Бандорин Л.Е. Градостроительное право. М.: Проспект, 2022. 312 с. EDN: RWUAJS.
2. Миронов В. Профессия «бизнес-аналитик». М.: Олимп-Бизнес, 2022. 238 с.
3. Approach to formalizing software projects for solving design automation and project management tasks. A. Filippov, A. Romanov, A. Skalkin, J. Stroeva, N. Yarushkina. Software, 2023, vol. 2, Iss. 1, pp. 133–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/software2010006. EDN: OJYZLM.
4. Шаврина К.В., Чекалкина Н.Д., Максимов К.В. Согласование проектно-сметной документации в электронном виде. Молодой ученый, 2019, № 22 (260), C. 201–206. EDN: FRBLUH.
5. The CHAOS Manifesto. URL: https://larlet.fr/static/david/stream/ChaosManifesto2013.pdf (дата обращения 10.06.2025).
6. E-commerce sales revenues forecasting by means of dynamically designing, developing and validating a directed acyclic graph (DAG) network for deep learning. D. Petroșanu, A. Pirjan, G. Căruţaşu, A. Tăbușcă, D. Zirra, A. Perju-Mitran. Electronics, 2022, vol. 11, Iss. 18, 2940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11182940.
7. Wind speed analysis of hurricane sandy. P. Martínez, I. Pérez, M. Sánchez, M. García, N. Pardo. Atmosphere, 2021, vol. 12, Iss. 11, 1480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12111480.
8. Грицаев Р.Т., Николаенко В.С., Пузанов А.Л. Основная, вспомогательная и необязательная документация в ИТ-проектах. Управление знаниями в цифровой экономике: сборник научных статей Международной молодежной конференции по управлению знаниями. М.: ВШЭ, 2018. С. 36–41. EDN: YUSPJB.
9. Mazur K., Saleh M., Hornung M. Integrating life cycle assessment in conceptual aircraft design: a comparative tool analysis. Aerospace, 2024, vol. 11, Iss. 1, 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11010101. EDN: VYECKF.
10. How to simplify life cycle assessment for industrial applications – a comprehensive review. S. Kiemel, C. Rietdorf, M. Schutzbach, R. Miehe. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, Iss. 23, 15704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315704. EDN: BLJPPL.
11. Минзов А.С., Мельникова О.И. Применение профессиональных стандартов при обучении методам и технологиям программной инженерии в высшей школе. Открытое образование, 2018, Т. 22, № 2, С. 27–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2018-2-27-36. EDN: YXOPLK.
12. Wijayanti D., Sukwika T., Ramli S. Analisis Insiden Fatality Akibat Covid-19 Menggunakan Metode 5 Why, SCAT, BowTie, dan Interpretive Structural Model (ISM). Jurnal Migasian, 2022, vol. 6, № 1, pp. 84–92. DOI: 10.36601/jurnal-migasian.v6i1.186.
13. Menezes T. A review to find elicitation methods for business process automation software. Software, 2023, vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 177–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/software2020008.
14. Automated cyber and privacy risk management toolkit. G. Gonzalez-Granadillo, S.A. Menesidou, D. Papamartzivanos, R. Romeu, D. Navarro-Llobet, C. Okoh, S. Nifakos, C. Xenakis, E. Panaousis. Sensors, 2021, vol. 21, № 16, 5493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165493. EDN: JXOORY.
15. Николаенко В.С. Негативные и позитивные риски в ИТ-проектах. Вестник московского университета. Серия 21: Управление (государство и общество), 2018, № 3, С. 91–124. EDN: XYTFOX.
16. Nikolaenko V., Sidorov A. Assessment of project management maturity models strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2023, vol. 16, Iss. 2, 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16020121. EDN: UOEIOH.
17. Гончарова Т.В., Литвина Д.Б. Правила создания комплекта рабочей документации. Экономические науки. Современное состояние и перспективы развития: материалы ХI международной студенческой научно-практической конференции. Екатеринбург: ИМПРУВ, 2018. С. 27–30. EDN: YSYELS.
18. Вариант оформления документа «перечень (комплектность) рабочей конструкторской документации». Е.И. Кича, М.А. Кича, Д.С. Маловик, В.С. Михайленко, В.В. Зайцева Вестник МАНЭБ, 2022, Т. 27, № 2, С. 49–58. EDN: GZINJV.
19. Баулин А.В., Перунов А.С., Ермаков В.А. Строительный контроль в процессе сдачи объекта в эксплуатацию. Промышленное и гражданское строительство, 2020, № 1, С. 53–59. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2020.01.53-59. EDN: WRNLAC.
20. Кудратова Г.М., Тарасов Р.В., Макарова Л.В. Разработка мероприятий по совершенствованию приемочного контроля продукции строительного назначения. Дневник науки, 2019, № 1 (25), С. 1−8. EDN: YWAJSX.
REFERENCES
1. Boltanova E.S., Romanova O.A., Bandorin L.E. Urban planning law. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2022. 312 p. (In Russ.) EDN: RWUAJS.
2. Mironov V. The profession of «business analyst». Moscow, Olimp-Business Publ., 2022. 238 p. (In Russ.)
3. Filippov A., Romanov A., Skalkin A., Stroeva J., Yarushkina N. Approach to Formalizing Software Projects for Solving Design Automation and Project Management Tasks. Software, 2023, vol. 2, Iss. 1, pp. 133–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/software2010006. EDN: OJYZLM.
4. Shavrina K.V., Chekalkina N.D., Maksimov K.V. Coordination of design and estimate documentation in electronic form. Young scientist, 2019, no. 22 (260), pp. 201–206. (In Russ.) EDN: FRBLUH.
5. The CHAOS Manifesto. Available at: https://larlet.fr/static/david/stream/ChaosManifesto2013.pdf (accessed 10 June 2025).
6. Petroșanu D., Pirjan A., Căruţaşu G., Tăbușcă A., Zirra D., Perju-Mitran A. E-commerce sales revenues forecasting by means of dynamically designing, developing and validating a directed acyclic graph (DAG) network for deep learning. Electronics, 2022, vol. 11, Iss. 18, 2940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11182940.
7. Martínez P., Pérez I., Sánchez M., García. M., Pardo N. Wind speed analysis of hurricane sandy. Atmosphere, 2021, vol. 12, Iss. 11, 1480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12111480.
8. Gritsaev R.T., Nikolaenko V.S., Puzanov A.L. Primary, auxiliary and optional documentation in IT projects. Knowledge management in the digital economy. Collection of scientific articles of the International youth conference on knowledge management. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2018. pp. 36–41. (In Russ.) EDN: YUSPJB.
9. Mazur K., Saleh M., Hornung M. Integrating life cycle assessment in conceptual aircraft design: a comparative tool analysis. Aerospace, 2024, vol. 11, Iss. 1, 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11010101. EDN: VYECKF.
10. Kiemel S., Rietdorf C., Schutzbach M., Miehe R. How to simplify life cycle assessment for industrial applications – a comprehensive review. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, Iss. 23, 15704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315704. EDN: BLJPPL.
11. Minzov A.S., Melnikova O.I. Application of professional standards for training in methods and technologies of software engineering at the higher education institutions. Open Education, 2018, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 27–36. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2018-2-27-36. EDN: YXOPLK.
12. Wijayanti D., Sukwika T., Ramli S. Analisis Insiden Fatality Akibat Covid-19 Menggunakan Metode 5 Why, SCAT, BowTie, dan Interpretive Structural Model (ISM). Jurnal Migasian, 2022, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 84–92. DOI: 10.36601/jurnal-migasian.v6i1.186.
13. Menezes T. A review to find elicitation methods for business process automation software. Software, 2023, vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 177–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/software2020008.
14. Gonzalez-Granadillo G., Menesidou S. A., Papamartzivanos D., Romeu R., Navarro-Llobet D., Okoh C., Nifakos S., Xenakis C., Panaousis E. Automated cyber and privacy risk management toolkit. Sensors, 2021, vol. 21, no. 16, 5493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165493. EDN: JXOORY.
15. Nikolaenko V.S. Negative and positive risks in IT projects. Moscow university bulletin. Series 21. Public administration, 2018, no. 3, pp. 91–124. (In Russ.) EDN: XYTFOX.
16. Nikolaenko V., Sidorov A. Assessment of project management maturity models strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2023, vol. 16, Iss. 2, 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16020121. EDN: UOEIOH.
17. Goncharova T.V., Litvina D.B. Rules for creating a set of working documentation. Economic sciences. Current state and development prospects. Proceedings of the XI international student scientific and practical conference. Ekaterinburg, IMPRUV Publ., 2018. pp. 27–30. (In Russ.) EDN: YSYELS.
18. Kicha E.I., Kicha M.A., Malovik D.S., Mikhaylenko V.S., Zaytseva V.V. Version of the document "list (completeness) of working design documentation". MANEB Bulletin, 2022, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 49–58. (In Russ.) EDN: GZINJV.
19. Baulin A.V., Perunov A.S., Ermakov V.A. Construction control in the process of commissioning. Industrial and civil engineering, 2020, no. 1, pp. 53–59. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2020.01.53-59. EDN: WRNLAC.
20. Kudratova G.M., Tarasov R.V., Makarova L.V. Development of actions for improvement of acceptance control of products of construction appointment. Diary of Science, 2019, no. 1 (25), pp. 1−8. (In Russ.) EDN: YWAJSX.
