Vol. 53 No. 4 (2025): Published December 30, 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.18799/26584956/2025/4/2041
About the concept of technoidentity
The concept of technoidentity in technoscience is becoming increasingly relevant because of the rapid development of technologies and their integration into everyday life. Technoidentity is a concept that reflects the formation and development of the identity of a person or subject in a technological environment, as well as the interaction of a person with technological systems. The concept helps to analyze how technologies influence the formation of values and self-perception. The development of neurotechnologies, implants and cybernetic systems expands the boundaries of human identity, causing the need to rethink the concept of "I" in the context of technoscience. In the context of possible singularity and the development of transhumanist ideas, technoidentity becomes a key concept for discussing the future of a man and his place in the technological world. Thus, the relevance of the concept of technoidentity in technoscience is due to the need to understand changes in self-perception, the ethical aspects of human interaction with technology and the formation of new types of self-awareness in the context of the technological era. This article provides a brief explanation of the role of technoscience in the life of a modern man and an analysis of the concept of technoidentity in technoscience. Aim. To reveal the concept of technoidentity within the framework of technoscience. Methods. General scientific methods, comparative analysis, content analysis, analysis and synthesis. Results. The author obtained the description of the concept of technoidentity within the framework of technoscience. Conclusions. Technoscience is a complex structure that encompasses the interaction of technologies and scientific methods, which poses a number of questions concerning body and corporeality. The concept of technoidentity occupies a central place within technoscience, since it is at the border of the body and technology, which is an integral part of technoscience, a new technoidentity is born.
Keywords:
technoscience, technoidentity, cyborgization, science, human, posthuman
References:
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
1. Тищенко П.Д. Конструирование человека: идеалы и технологии // Рабочие тетради по биоэтике. Вып. 22. – Москва: Московский гуманитарный университет, 2015. – С. 36–64. EDN: VTCEBH.
2. Arnaldi S., Crabu S., Viteritti A. Technoscience in the remaking of human bodies: knowledge, identities and discourses // Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies. – 2023. – Vol. 14. – № 1. – P. 9–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17953.
3. Биотехнологическое улучшение человека как проблема социально-гуманитарного знания: материалы Школы молодых учёных / под ред. Б.Г. Юдина, О.В. Поповой. – М.: Издательство Московского гуманитарного университета, 2017. – 208 с. EDN: ZVRYKH.
4. Моисеева А.П., Баканова Е.А. Феномен технонауки // Векторы благополучия: экономика и социум. – 2017. – № 2 (25). – С. 45–58.
5. Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine / A.E. Clarke, J.K. Shim, L. Mamo, J.R. Fosket, J.R. Fishman // American Sociological Review. – 2003. – Vol. 68. – P. 161–194. DOI: 10.2307/1519765.
6. Бердяев Н.А. Человек и машина (Проблема социологии и метафизики техники) // Путь. – 1933. – № 38. – С. 3–38.
7. Розин В.М. Феноменологическое осмысление М. Хайдеггером техники (на материале статьи «Вопрос о технике») // Философия науки и техники. – 2023. – Т. 28. – № 2. – С. 49−62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2023-28-2-49-62.
8. Хайдеггер М. Вопрос о технике // Время и бытие: статьи и выступления. – М.: Республика, 1993. – С. 221–238.
9. Тищенко П.Д. Биовласть в эпоху биотехнологий. – М.: Институт философии РАН, 2001. – 177 c.
10. Технонаука и социальная оценка техники (философско-методологический анализ): коллективная монография / под ред. И.В. Черниковой. – Томск: Изд-во ТГУ, 2015. – 168 с.
11. Юдин Б.Г. Технонаука и «улучшение» человека // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. – 2016. – T. XLVIII. – № 2. – С. 18–27.
12. Нейротехнологии и технонаука: феномен биотехноидентичности / под ред. Р.Р. Белялетдинова. – М.: Издательство Московского гуманитарного университета, 2020. – 182 с.
13. Попова О.В., Белялетдинов Р.Р., Попов В.В. Биосоциальность. Генетизация. Биоидентичность: научная монография / под общ. ред. О.В. Поповой. – М: NOTA BENE, 2023. – 296 с.
14. Фукуяма Ф. Наше постчеловеческое будущее. Последствия биотехнологической революции. – М.: АСТ: Люкс, 2005. – 349 с.
15. Лекторский В.А. Эпистемология классическая и неклассическая. – М.: УРСС, 2001. – 255 с.
16. Марсель Г. Быть и иметь. – Новочеркасск: САГУНА, 1994. – 160 с.
17. Мерло-Понти М. Феноменология восприятия. – М: Ювента: Наука, 1999. – 608 c.
18. Молоканов А.А. Философия тела: противоположность православной и трансгуманистической концепций // Научная мысль Кавказа. – 2024. – № 1. – С. 18–25. DOI: 10.18522/2072-0181-2024-117-18-25.
19. Попова О.В. От телесного канона нового времени к осмыслению современных практик биотехнологического конструирования // Философская антропология. – 2018. – Т. 4. – № 2. – С. 51–68. DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2018-4-2-51-68.
20. Пак Г.С. Телесная идентичность: возможности манипулирования // Труды Белгородской православной духовной семинарии (с миссионерской направленностью). – 2023. – № 16. – С. 268–277. EDN: PBVZBM.
21. Емелин В.А. Философско-методологический анализ трансформации идентичности человека в условиях развития технологий информационного общества: дис. ... д-ра филос. наук. – М., 2017. – 435 с.
22. Clynes M., Kline N. Cyborgs and space // Astronautics. – 1960. – Vol 5. – № 9. – P. 27–31.
23. Гнатик Е.Н., Лисеев И.К. Эпоха постчеловека как трансгуманистический образ будущего // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. – 2023. – Т. 19. – № 2. – С. 284–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_11_284_293. EDN: TFDEBS.
24. Haddow G., Åsberg C., Timeto F. Cyborg figurations: exploring the intersections of technology, embodiment, identity, and ecology // Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies. – 2023. – Vol. 14. – № 1. – P. 123–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17747.
REFERENCES
1. Tishchenko P.D. Designing a human: ideals and technologies. Workbooks on Bioethics. Moscow, Moscow University for the Humanities Press, 2015. Vol. 22, pp. 36–64. (In Russ.) EDN: VTCEBH.
2. Arnaldi S., Crabu S., Viteritti A. Technoscience in the remaking of human bodies: knowledge, identities and discourses. Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 2023, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 9–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/179537.
3. Biotechnological enhancement of humans as a problem of social and humanitarian knowledge: materials of the School of Young Scientists. Eds. B.G. Yudin, O.V. Popova. Moscow, Moscow University for the Humanities Publi. house, 2017. 208 p. (In Russ.) EDN: ZVRYKH.
4. Moiseeva A.P., Bakanova E.A. Phenomenon of technoscience. Journal of Wellbeing Technologies, 2017, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 45–58. (In Russ.) EDN: ZDBCAN.
5. Clarke A.E., Shim J.K., Mamo L., Fosket J.R., Fishman J.R. Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 2003, vol. 68, pp. 161–194. DOI: 10.2307/1519765.
6. Berdyaev N.A. Man and machine (the problem of the sociology and metaphysics of technology). Put, 1933, no. 38, pp. 3–37. (In Russ.)
7. Rozin V.M. Phenomenological understanding of technology by M. Heidegger (on the material of the article “The Question Concerning Technology”). Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2023, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 49–62. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2023-28-2-49-62.
8. Heidegger M. The question concerning technology. Being and Time. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1993. pp. 221–237. (In Russ.)
9. Tischenko P.D. Biopower in the era of biotechnologies. Moscow, Institute of Phylosophy Press, 2001. 177 p. (In Russ.)
10. Technoscience and social assessment of technology (philosophical and methodological analysis): monograph. Ed. by I.V. Chernikova. Tomsk, TGU Publ., 2015. 168 p. (In Russ.)
11. Yudin B.G. Technoscience and human ‘enhancement’. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2016, vol. XLVIII, no. 2, pp. 18–27. (In Russ.)
12. Neurotechnologies and technoscience: phenomenon of biotechnoidentity. Ed. by R.R. Belyaletdinov. Moscow, Moscow University for the humanities Publ., 2020. 182 р. (In Russ.)
13. Popova O.V., Belyaletdinov R.R., Popov V.V. Biosociality. Genetisation. Bioidentity: scientific monograph. Ed. by O.V. Popova. Moscow, NOTA BENE Publ., 2023. 296 p. (In Russ.)
14. Fukuyama F. Our posthuman future. Moscow, AST Publ., Luxe Publ., 2005. 349 p. (In Russ.)
15. Lektorsky V.A. Classical and non-classical epistemology. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2001. 255 p. (In Russ.)
16. Marcel G. To be and to have. Novocherkassk, SAGUNA Publ., 1994. 160 p. (In Russ.)
17. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. Moscow, Yuventa Publ., Nauka Publ., 1999. 608 p. (In Russ.)
18. Molokanov A.A. The philosophy of the body: the opposite of the orthodox and transhumanistic concepts. Scientific thought of Caucasus, 2024, no. 1, pp. 18–25. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18522/2072-0181-2024-117-18-25.
19. Popova O.V. From the body canon of modern times to the comprehension of modern practices of biotechnological design. Philosophical anthropology, 2018, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 51–68. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2018-4-2- 51-68.
20. Pak G.S. Body identity: possibilities of manipulation. The works of the Belgorod orthodox theological seminary (with missionary orientation), 2023, no. 16, pp. 268–277. (In Russ.) EDN: PBVZBM.
21. Emelin V.A. Philosophical and methodological analysis of the transformation of human identity in the context of the development of information society technologies. Dr. Diss. Moscow, 2017. 435 p. (In Russ.)
22. Clynes M., Kline N. Cyborgs and space. Astronautics, 1960, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 27–31.
23. Gnatik E.N., Liseev I.K. The posthuman era as a transhumanist image of the future. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 2023, vol. 19, no 2, pp. 284–293. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_11_284_293. EDN: TFDEBS.
24. Haddow G., Åsberg C., Timeto F. Cyborg figurations: exploring the intersections of technology, embodiment, identity, and ecology. Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 2023, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 123–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17747.
